AIShow anyone who asks how AI is governed, every month.
AI Close reports how AI is actually used across your organization, flags where reality has drifted from your policy, and gives your board, your auditors, and the clients you serve one record they can all read.
Built for teams that answer to boards, regulators, and the clients they serve.
Built for the people you answer to
Your monthly close shows your examiner how AI use matched your policy, where it drifted, and what you did about it.
Written for the National Credit Union Administration exam context.
Sign-off and versioning your board can stand behind.
See a sample close →Community banks answer to boards, auditors, and federal supervisors.
AI Close turns actual AI usage into a signed, versioned record all of them can read.
No technical translation required.
See a sample close →A policy says what is allowed. It cannot show what is actually happening.
Your staff already use AI. Your vendors keep adding AI features to the software you run. And the people you answer to, your board, your auditors, your regulators, and the clients you serve, are asking how you govern all of it. A policy is a point-in-time document: the day it is adopted, reality starts to drift. A tool gets adopted, an exception is granted and never written down. By the time someone asks you to show your work, the gap between the policy and reality is the finding. The monthly close is the ongoing proof that keeps the two in sync.
One report. Board-ready on top, examiner-ready underneath.
A monthly record of how AI is actually used across your organization, or the clients you serve, drawn from one source so the summary your board reads and the detail your auditors and examiners review always agree. It also shows leadership where AI is already helping and where governance still needs to catch up.
Board-ready summary
A few plain sentences your board can read and forward, no jargon.
AI tool inventory
Every AI tool in use, by department, with approval status and activity.
Findings
Where reality has drifted from your policy, with an owner and a status.
Examiner-ready detail
A timestamped evidence trail behind every line of the summary.
Three steps to a monthly close
Tell us your AI use cases
Name the AI tools your staff use and where: Lending, Marketing, Customer Support. You describe how your organization, or the clients you serve, already works. No setup, no technical work.
Your use casesAI Close governs them
We turn your use cases into a governed monthly close, measured against your policy, with findings wherever reality has drifted from what the policy allows.
Governed monthlyGet your close every month
A board-ready summary and examiner-ready detail, with open findings tracked to resolution between reviews.
Board + examinerBuilt to pass your vendor review
The questions your information-security and vendor-management process will ask, answered up front. Whether your AI is reviewed by an examiner, an auditor, or the clients you serve, the same record answers them. Need the formal version? Request our due-diligence pack →
Mapped to the federal AI framework
The close maps to the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (Govern, Map, Measure, Manage), a framework examiners point to for AI, and to NCUA, FDIC, OCC, Federal Reserve, and state expectations.
SOC 2 Type I in progress
Report available under NDA. Our current controls are available for your team to review now.
No customer data, by design
The close looks at which AI tools are in use and how they measure against your policy. It is built to avoid member and customer data, so there is nothing sensitive for us to hold.
Be one of the first. Lock in founding terms.
First 10 institutionsWe are early, and we treat that as your advantage. The first institutions to come on keep their founding pricing for as long as they stay subscribed, and a direct line to the team rather than a ticket queue.
The questions your team will ask
Will this hold up with our board, auditors, and examiners? +
It is your governance record. The close is mapped to NIST AI RMF and framed for your primary regulator, and it documents how AI is used, how it is governed, and where the gaps are, with the owner and cadence your examiner looks for. Examiners assess your institution’s governance, not the tool that assembled the record. If you serve financial institutions rather than being examined yourself, the same record answers the vendor due-diligence and governance questions your bank partners and auditors ask.
What exactly is the monthly close? +
A monthly report of how AI is actually used across your institution: a tool inventory, usage measured against your policy, findings where reality has drifted, a board-ready summary, and examiner-ready detail drawn from the same source.
What data does the close use? +
It looks at where AI shows up: the tools in use, vendor AI features, and how that usage measures against your policy. It is built to avoid member and customer data, so there is nothing sensitive for us to hold.
How is this different from the compliance tools we already have? +
Most compliance platforms help you do compliance work, some now with AI assistance. AI Close governs the AI your institution deploys: the vendor-embedded features, the staff tools, the shadow use your examiner is asking about. Different job. It fills the gap those platforms leave, and sits alongside them.
Will this pass our vendor due-diligence review? +
The short version your vendor-management process needs: no member or customer data by design, encryption in transit and at rest, SOC 2 Type I in progress with the report available under NDA, and a standing offer to walk your team through our current controls now.
What happens to our data if we cancel? +
Everything is yours. Every monthly close is exportable at any time. Cancel and you keep all of it; we delete your account data on request. No lock in is the point: the close earns its renewal every month or it does not deserve it.